[...] > > Any more thoughts on this? > > I have been discussing with Thierry and we think that selecting PM for > tegra still makes the most sense. The question is, is this ok for > multi-configs? Yes, this is too me the best option. Additionally, for those tegra SoCs/platforms that needs PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS, it can safely select that as well. > > The only other suggestion/thought I have is to allow > PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF to be selected independently of PM so that we can > have minimal support for PM domains that allows you to register PM > domains with the kernel and their current state, but does not allow you > to control them, etc. This way tegra could always select > PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF regardless of PM, and we would be able to > determine if we can probe a device safely. > > I am not sure that Rafael is too keen on this approach but that is the > only alternative I have come up with. I think Rafael already made his point around this approach, which is a clear no. And I fully agree with it. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
