Re: [PATCH v7] pinctrl: imx27: imx27 pincontrol driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am Donnerstag, den 07.11.2013, 10:12 +0100 schrieb Markus Pargmann:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:54:02AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
[...]
> > 
> > Would it be so bad to implement this as a regmap and have two drivers
> > access the same regmap on the Linux side? You don't need two nodes for
> > that, and the IOMUX definitions can live under the GPIO node. There is
> > NOTHING stopping two drivers on Linux matching the same compatible
> > property. Locking and coordination in software of a single IP block
> > used by two drivers shouldn't be arbitrated by the device tree.
> 
> I am not sure if it is practical to use the GPIO nodes for the IOMUX
> driver. There are actually 6 GPIO nodes. This would lead to 6
> iomux controllers? The different pin functions may be distributed over
> different controllers then.
> 
> The first version of this series [1] was designed to have a iomux node
> with 6 gpio subnodes.

Why was this changed? Having two different DT nodes requesting the same
IO region is certainly the wrong thing to do.

Regards,
Lucas

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Lucas Stach                 |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux