Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] USB: core: let USB device know device node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:07:13AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 January 2016 11:48:39 Peter Chen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Alternatively, you could use one of the high bits of the 'reg' value
> > > > to indicate which root hub is used. I'm sure that would work as
> > > > well, but be less obvious.
> > > 
> > > It's probably best to stick with the same numbering that the hardware 
> > > uses.
> > 
> > Seems we are talking about root hub, not the device in the
> > root hub. So for multiple ports controller, we have to own node for 
> > root hub. Assume your example, there is a genesys HUB at physical
> > port 1, I suggest a dts node description like below, please correct
> > me if anything wrong.
> > 
> > &usb1 {
> >         roothub_1: nxp@1 {
> >                 compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
> >                 reg = <0x01>;
> > 
> >                 hub: genesys@1 {
> >                         compatible = "usb05e3,0608";
> >                         reg = <0x01>;
> >                 };
> >         };
> > 
> >         roothub_2: nxp@2 {
> >                 compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
> >                 reg = <0x02>;
> >         };
> > 
> >         ...
> > 
> >         roothub_7: nxp@7 {
> >                 compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
> >                 reg = <0x07>;
> > 
> >                 hub: genesys@1 {
> >                         compatible = "usb05e3,0608";
> >                         reg = <0x01>;
> >                 };
> >         };
> > 
> >         ...
> > 
> >         roothub_9: nxp@9 {
> >                 compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
> >                 reg = <0x09>;
> >         };
> > };
> 
> This looks wrong to me: if I understand it right, you are now modeling
> each port of the root hub as a separate hub, so you end up with
> a total of 11 hub nodes when there should only be one or two.
> 

How about below from both driver and device tree view:

1. From the USB driver view

			USB Controller
				|
				|
	   ---------------------|----------------
		|				|	
	    root hub(HS)		root hub(SS, optional)
		|				|
	---------------------		-------------------------	
	|	|	... |		|	  |         |
      port 1	port 2	   port 6	port 1	port 2	  port 3
	|				|
     genesys hub (if HS)	      genesys hub (if SS)	

2. dts node:

&usb1 {
        port_1: nxp@1 {
                compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
                reg = <0x01>;

                hub: genesys@1 {
                        compatible = "usb05e3,0608";
                        reg = <0x01>;
                };
        };

        port_2: nxp@2 {
                compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
                reg = <0x02>;
        };

        ...

        port_7: nxp@7 {
                compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
                reg = <0x07>;

                hub: genesys@1 {
                        compatible = "usb05e3,0608";
                        reg = <0x01>;
                };
        };

        ...

        port_9: nxp@9 {
                compatible = "usb15a2,007d";
                reg = <0x09>;
        };
};

- If the above are ok, is it ok we add two nodes for the same device
in case the speed negotiation is different at some situations?
- Usually, it should be ok we only add nodes at device tree which
the hard wired device on it, like port_1 and port 7 at above, right?

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux