Am 15.01.2016 um 20:40 schrieb Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>: > On Fri 2016-01-15 10:34:51, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> Am 13.01.2016 um 20:15 schrieb Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:28:00PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >>>> Hi Tomeu, >>>> >>>> Am 12.01.2016 um 14:06 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> >>>>> On 11 May 2015 at 03:56, NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> here is version 4 of my "UART slave device" patch set, previously >>>>>> known as "tty slave devices". >>>>> >>>>> Hi Neil, >>>>> >>>>> do you (or someone else) have plans to continue this work in the short >>>>> or medium term? >>>> >>>> yes, there is something in our upstreaming pipeline. This one works for us on top of 4.4.0: >>>> >>>> <http://git.goldelico.com/?p=gta04-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/work/hns/misc/w2sg-tty-slave2-v4> >>>> >>>> There is one point still to be solved: the exact style of the DT bindings. >>>> >>>> We have an idea how a driver can implement two different styles (child node AND phandle) >>>> so that it is up to the DTS developer to use the one that best fits into the existing DTS. >>> >>> From my perspective as a binding maintainer, and as I stated before, the >>> child node approach made the most sense and was most consistent with the >> >>> way we handle other devices. >> >> I simply don't see that this is the most common way other devices >> are handled. > > You promised to shut up once maintainers speak, that happened, and you > did not shut up. Just do it now. Nobody has asked for your unqualified and not helpful comments. So please shut up yourself and stop to disturb Free Software projects. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
