Hi Maxime,
Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2016, 16:24 +0100 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> The core currently doesn't check that the DT cell size matches what the
> driver declares, which means that every xlate function needs to duplicate
> that check.
>
> Make sure that of_reset_control_get checks for this to avoid duplication
> and errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/reset/core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index 7955e00d04d4..d53b2b980bdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ struct reset_control {
> static int of_reset_simple_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON(reset_spec->args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> if (reset_spec->args[0] >= rcdev->nr_resets)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -182,6 +179,9 @@ struct reset_control *of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node,
> return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> }
>
> + if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
Applied with this fix:
- if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells))
+ if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&reset_controller_list_mutex);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
No further action needed if you agree, otherwise let me know and I'll
back it out.
best regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
