Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] clk: bcm2835: avoid the use of BCM2835_CLOCK_COUNT in clk-bcm2835

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On 14.01.2016 01:13, Michael Turquette wrote:
Quoting Michael Turquette (2016-01-13 12:00:12)
Hi Martin,

Quoting kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2016-01-11 11:55:53)
  static int bcm2835_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
         struct clk **clks;
+       size_t clk_cnt;
         struct bcm2835_cprman *cprman;
         struct resource *res;
+       size_t i;
+
+       /* find the max clock index */
+       clk_cnt = BCM2835_CLOCK_PERI_IMAGE; /* see below */
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bcm2835_register_clocks); i++)
+               clk_cnt = max(clk_cnt, bcm2835_register_clocks[i].index);
+       clk_cnt += 1;

I'm not sure how this solution is better than using CLOCK_COUNT. Some
other bindings use a max value, NR_CLKS or other sentinel.

Why did you not choose to set clk_cnt equal to BCM2835_CLOCK_PWM? Why
not initialize it to zero?

OK, I just caught up on the asoc/bcm2835 thread.

Really the best solution would be to have an array of all of the clks in
the driver and just use ARRAY_SIZE on it.

For your driver, could you make an array of clk_hw pointers and call
devm_clk_register on all of them in a loop? This gets rid of the big
pile of explicit calls in bcm2835_clk_probe.

You can also get rid of stuff like bcm2835_plla_core_data by just
stuffing that data into a single struct initialization. Here is a
snippet for how the qcom clk drivers do it:

static struct clk_pll gpll0 = {
	.l_reg = 0x0004,
	.m_reg = 0x0008,
	.n_reg = 0x000c,
	.config_reg = 0x0014,
	.mode_reg = 0x0000,
	.status_reg = 0x001c,
	.status_bit = 17,
	.clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
		.name = "gpll0",
		.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo" },
		.num_parents = 1,
		.ops = &clk_pll_ops,
	},
};

I did not know you could do that - that could make life easier...

But a quick look shows that this approach probably would require a
major rewrite of all the methods.

static int bcm2835_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
	...
	for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
		clk = devm_clk_register(dev, array_of_clks[i].hw)
	...
}

I guess I can use a slightly different approach that does not
require as many changes, that looks like this:

static const struct bcm2835_clk_desc clk_desc_array[] = {
	/* register PLL */
	[BCM2835_PLLA]          = REGISTER_PLL(&bcm2835_plla_data),
	...
};
...
static int bcm2835_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
	const size_t asize = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_desc_array);
	...
	for (i = 0; i < asize; i++) {
		desc = &clk_desc_array[i];
		if (desc)
			clks[i] = desc->clk_register(cprman,
						     desc->data);
	}
	...
}

If we need to order the initialization then we can add some
priority field to clk_desc_array and iterate over all the priority
values.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux