>>>>> "Yang," == Yang, Wenyou <Wenyou.Yang@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Isn't the regulator part of the act8945a identical to act8865? Can't we just use the >> existing act8865-regulator.c driver? (E.G. support 8865 variant in the mfd driver, >> but only register the regulator sub device?) > Yes, the regulator part of the act8945a is identical to act8865. > But the act8865-regulator driver is a struct i2c_driver, and the mfd > sub-device driver is a platform_driver driver, it is not easy to use > it. But the mfd driver could support the act8865 variant as well (by only registering the regulator mfd cell). -- Venlig hilsen, Peter Korsgaard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
