On Wednesday 13 January 2016 05:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 12.01.2016 18:17, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Maxim Semiconductor's PMIC MAX77620, MAX77686, MAX20024 have
same RTC IP on these PMICs.
Add generic MAX77xxxx series RTC driver which can be used as
RTC driver for these PMIC and avoids duplication of RTC driver
for each PMICs. Their MFD driver can be different here.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes from V1:
- Rename the file to rtc-max77xxx.c and make the generic implementation.
- Direct regmap apis are used for the register access.
- Decouped from max77620 driver.
- Taken care of cleanup comments form V1 version.
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 10 +
drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/rtc/rtc-max77xxx.c | 500 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 511 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-max77xxx.c
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
index 376322f..4972dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
@@ -315,6 +315,16 @@ config RTC_DRV_MAX8997
This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
will be called rtc-max8997.
+config RTC_DRV_MAX77XXX
+ tristate "Maxim MAX77XXX series generic RTC driver"
+ help
+ If you say yes here you will get support for the generic RTC driver
+ for Maxim Semiconductor MAX77XXX series of PMIC like MAX77620.
+ This also supports the RTC driver for Maxim PMIC MaX20024 which
+ is almost same as MAX77620.
+ This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
+ will be called rtc-max77xxx.
+
That was not the consensus... You still added a new driver - but now
with different name.
That is useless duplication
Please work with existing code. Use existing maxim RTC drivers: either
max77686 or max77802.
There is no need for new one.
If we modify the existing one then that work will be outside of this
series to make it independent.
However, the file name does not suggest common in older file. Also this
will require mfd and rtc driver changes to decouple it.
Here is my approach:
- Let's have common driver in implementation and file name. This will be
independent of the mfd driver on all sense.
- Once it is merged, move the max77686 and max77802 to use this driver,
this will need the modification on the mfd driver, related defconfig
file and if specific stuff needed in the rtc then addition of that.
Per your approach:
- Modify rtc max77686 and mfd driver max77686 to decouple and proper
registration.
- Add support of max77620 on the max77686 driver if any specific is
required.
That is also fine to me but still I am not comfortable with the config
name and driver file name as this does not suggest the common.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
