Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Måns Rullgård <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:24:56PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: >>>> Some boards connect the LCD_RESET pin to a reset input on the >>>> display panel. On these boards, this pin must be set to the >>>> proper level for the display to function. >>>> >>>> This adds an optional "reset-active" property to the "display" >>>> subnode such that devicetrees can specify the desired polarity >>>> of the LCD_RESET pin. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> What happened to this patch? > > If I acked it, then I'm expecting the platform or subsystem maintainer > to pick up the series. I don't have patch #2 either, so I'm definitely > not picking up the series. Argh, get_maintainer.pl picking different people for different patches again. I really wish it would/could send all patches in a series to the same recipients in cases like this. Should I resend both to the combined set of people so everybody gets to see everything? -- Måns Rullgård -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
