On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:55:48AM +0100, Martin Sperl wrote: > So if someone with a better idea how to keep those dt-binding includes > synchronized with the definitions used by the code step forward and > propose a better solution how to get that implemented? > I guess there will be a few more occurrences of clocks that are > currently not defined, which will need to get introduced in the future > PWM and PCM were just the last in this series. Presumably just making the code not rely on having a define for the number of clocks would deal with the problem (eg, using ARRAY_SIZE internally).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
