Hi Linus, On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad > <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar >>> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in >>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Is this a regression that should go in right now? >>> >> Yes it needs too. > > But on top of *what* exactly? > > This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and > not even on the mainline kernel. > Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier patches have gone via ARM tree itself [1]. If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree. > Is this something that should go on top of the davinci > GPIO patch set that is still being elaborated on? > Nope. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg275267.html Regards, --Prabhakar Lad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
