On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote: >> Hi Vinod, >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote: >> >> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu <rsahu@xxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware >> >> with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes >> >> the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line. >> >> >> >> Reference: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c >> > >> > I seem to have got this patch thrice :( >> Due to mail failure (some issue was in my email client) to some >> email-id it was multiple times, > > git send-email ? Yes, was not able to send Arnd Bergmann. > >> > >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu <rsahu@xxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c | 4 ++++ >> >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c >> >> index 9dfa2b0..6363e84 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c >> >> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ >> >> #include <linux/dmapool.h> >> >> #include <linux/interrupt.h> >> >> #include <linux/io.h> >> >> +#include <linux/irq.h> >> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> >> #include <linux/of_device.h> >> >> >> >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7 @@ static int xgene_dma_request_irqs(struct xgene_dma *pdma) >> >> /* Register DMA channel rx irq */ >> >> for (i = 0; i < XGENE_DMA_MAX_CHANNEL; i++) { >> >> chan = &pdma->chan[i]; >> >> + irq_set_status_flags(chan->rx_irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY); >> > >> > Why not use irq_settings_disable_unlazy(), at least read the reference you >> > pointed out! >> >> irq_settings_disable_unlazy() is helper function to test >> IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag is set or not, it's not for setting this flag. >> FYI... >> +static inline bool irq_settings_disable_unlazy(struct irq_desc *desc) >> +{ >> + return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY; >> +} > > Ah yes, I saw clear API and assumed there would be set. Then I think we > should add a set helper as well as the usage is intended for drivers to > set this flag > > Thomas, > > Any reason why you didn't add a set helper, only test and clear? > > -- > ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html