On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 02 January 2016 14:17:46 Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 12:19:52AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > - if (i2c_client->dev.of_node) { > > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && i2c_client->dev.of_node) { > > > > This would be a lot nicer if there was an __always_null annotation we > > could put on of_node for !OF configurations, that'd Just Work and this > > can't be the only case where we have this idiom. > > > > How about an inline helper like > > static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *dev) > { > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) > return dev->of_node; ITYM: return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ? dev->of_node : NULL; or if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) return dev->of_node; else return NULL; > } > > Arnd > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html