Hi Gerhard, On Nov 5, 2013, at 9:43 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 19:50 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> >> --- a/drivers/of/base.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c >> @@ -1641,6 +1641,7 @@ int of_attach_node(struct device_node *np) >> np->allnext = of_allnodes; >> np->parent->child = np; >> of_allnodes = np; >> + of_node_clear_flag(np, OF_DETACHED); >> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags); >> >> of_add_proc_dt_entry(np); > > Does this add a call to a routine which only gets introduced in a > subsequent patch (2/5)? If so, it would break builds during the > series, and thus would hinder bisection. > You're right, I'll re-order on the next series. > > virtually yours > Gerhard Sittig > -- > DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel > HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany > Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@xxxxxxx Regards -- Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
