On Monday 28 December 2015 15:14:50 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 25 December 2015 13:53:11 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 18 May 2015 17:07:57 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Monday 18 May 2015 08:06:07 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [150515 14:26]: > > > > > On Friday 15 May 2015 23:22:37 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > If setting up the generic binding is expected to take a while, > > > > you can naturally pass it in pdata while waiting for the > > > > generic binding to get merged. > > > > > > Yes, good idea. So the n900 machine can use auxdata to pass this > > > for the time being, while the binding and generic implementation > > > is being worked out. > > > > Ok, so what is needed to finish this patch series? > > I don't know where we are at this point. Has either the auxdata > approach or the generic binding been worked on at all? What are auxdata data? And what do you mean with "generic binding" approach? > If not, please try to get the auxdata variant to work, it should not > be hard at all because there is no dependency on a generic binding. > > Arnd -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
