On Nov 5, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Undocumented compatible strings in kernel sources: >>> 1682m-rng >>> electra-cf >>> electra-ide >>> pasemi,localbus >>> pasemi,localbus-nand >>> pasemi,pwrficient-rng >>> pasemi,sdc >> >> These will never be documented in the same way as flat device tree, >> just as the IBM and Sparc bindings won't be. > > Yes, I know. As well as FSL PPC... > > We may need some way to filter these out from whatever checker we come > up with. I was debating whether to add an undocumented, grandfathered > bindings document to capture these. The FSL PPC should have bindings, there are some cases that we put in things with simple nodes that had a compat, a reg, and maybe an irq w/o having a full binding. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
