On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 12:04 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 22/12/2015 at 12:16:41 -0600, Rob Herring wrote : > > Well, the binding should reflect that, whether the driver needs to > > be > > re-written is somewhat a separate question. That should probably > > have > > been done for the DS1302 driver originally and it is not too fair > > for > > the 2nd person to fix it. You could just have a single driver bound > > to > > the controller node which is aware of the DS1302 being the slave > > device (ignoring that part of the DT for now). > > > > I agree with Rob here. I won't require that you fix the driver but it > would be better to have a proper DT binding from the beginning so that > when the driver is fixed it will still work with the previous device > trees. No problem. I'll fix the driver. That's how it should be done. What should be done with SECUREEDGE support? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
