On Wednesday 23 December 2015 12:04:25 David Miller wrote:
> From: "David Rivshin (Allworx)" <drivshin.allworx@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 19:36:31 -0500
>
> > Testing by anyone who has real hardware using phy-handle or dual_emac
> > with fixed-link would be appreciated.
>
> I'm going to wait for such testing before applying this series.
>
> Thanks.
Successfully tested the following 3 configurations.
1. emac0 with phy_id and emac1 with fixed phy
2. emac0 with phy-handle and emac1 with fixed phy
3. emac0 with fixed phy and emac1 with fixed phy
Below are the affected DT nodes, with one cpsw_emac0 node choosen for each
test.
&cpsw_emac0 {
phy_id = <&davinci_mdio>, <5>;
phy-mode = "mii";
dual_emac_res_vlan = <4093>;
};
&cpsw_emac0 {
phy-mode = "mii";
dual_emac_res_vlan = <4093>;
phy-handle = <&phy0>;
};
&cpsw_emac0 {
phy-mode = "mii";
dual_emac_res_vlan = <4093>;
fixed-link {
speed = <100>;
full-duplex;
};
};
&cpsw_emac1 {
dual_emac_res_vlan = <4094>;
phy-mode = "mii";
fixed-link {
speed = <100>;
full-duplex;
};
};
&davinci_mdio {
status = "okay";
phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
reg = <5>;
};
};
ps: I don't have access to the board for the next 2 weeks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
