W dniu 23.12.2015 o 20:06, Tomasz Figa pisze: > 2015-12-23 19:58 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> W dniu 23.12.2015 o 19:54, Tomasz Figa pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2015-12-23 19:51 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> W dniu 22.12.2015 o 13:50, Olof Johansson pisze: >>>>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:39:42AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> Hi Kukjin, >>>>>> >>>>>> Pinctrl for v4.5. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Krzysztof >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The following changes since commit 8005c49d9aea74d382f474ce11afbbc7d7130bec: >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux 4.4-rc1 (2015-11-15 17:00:27 -0800) >>>>>> >>>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-drivers-4.5 >>>>>> >>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 023e06dfa6882f500b9c86fd61f0b1913aa07f36: >>>>>> >>>>>> pinctrl: exynos: add exynos5410 SoC specific data (2015-11-16 10:54:43 +0900) >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> This should either go in through the pinctrl tree, or have an acked/reviewed-by >>>>> one of the pinctrl maintainers. >>>> >>>> It was acked by Tomasz Figa - Samsung Pin Controller maintainer: >>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/450340/ >>> >>> Actually, is there any reason to send this through ARM SoC? Looks like >>> this pull request contains only pinctrl changes which could normally >>> go through pinctrl tree. Maybe Linus W. could simply pull it? >> >> Of course, I would be happy with it. >> >> But apparently I am the only one who continuously tracks all of these >> patches for Exynos (also for subsystems different than arch/arm/mach*). >> Yeah, I could ping everyone for every patch (not mine patch I mean)... >> but it is easier just to grab it after acking and send it. I really >> don't care about the method, just apply the damned patch ;) > > My intention was by no means to belittle your effort, really thanks > for doing this. :) > > I was just wondering if Linus couldn't pull this just as is, without > causing further commotion and unnecessarily introducing field for > potential conflicts between trees. That makes sense. The pinctrl driver change is not a direct dependency for anything in this pull request so from my side: Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> Linus, The patch can be cherry-picked from: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=samsung-drivers-4.5 (the only commit in tag: samsung-drivers-4.5) Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
