On Tuesday 15 December 2015 21:01:35 Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tuesday 15 December 2015 21:50:13 Sergei Ianovich wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 19:06 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> Updated plan: > >> 1. MACH_PXA27X_DT > >> 2. PXA_FB and 8250_PXA to enable console > What about gpio-pxa ? And maybe pinctrl-pxa27x (only in linux-next by now) ? Can > a pxafb work without gpio-pxa ? Also usually for pxafb you have pwm and pwm_bl > to see something. > > >> 3. MMC, MMC_PXA and EXT4_FS to enable boot from MMC > >> 3.1. MTD, MTD_CFI, MTD_PHYSMAP_OF and JFFS2_FS to enable boot from MTD > Ok. Is pxa2xx-pcmcia out of scope ? I seem to remember we have several boards > where pcmcia is the rootfs (even if that is a small mess right now I still have > to work on). Or do we consider pcmcia as obsolete ? I'm definitely fine with tossing in everything that is PXA specific, even if it's rarely used. If someone wants a smaller kernel, they can still start out with the defconfig and disable stuff they don't need, which tends to be easier than the opposite, and it gives us compile-time coverage with the autobuilders that compile every defconfig. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
