Hi Eduardo, again > I believe the problem here is actually the lack of error > handling/propagation. Are you sure you want to write to parameter > in the fail path ? > > rcar_thermal_update_temp already returns error code when it fails > to read temperature. Don't you think it would make more sense to fix the > places that call rcar_thermal_update_temp to properly handle its return > value and propagate that error code when necessary? Will update in v5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
