On 2015/12/11 23:21, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:45:17PM +0800, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>> add dt_machine definition for hi3519.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-hisi/hisilicon.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-hisi/hisilicon.c b/arch/arm/mach-hisi/hisilicon.c
>> index 8cc6215..010d8a2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-hisi/hisilicon.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-hisi/hisilicon.c
>> @@ -81,3 +81,12 @@ static const char *const hip01_compat[] __initconst = {
>> DT_MACHINE_START(HIP01, "Hisilicon HIP01 (Flattened Device Tree)")
>> .dt_compat = hip01_compat,
>> MACHINE_END
>> +
>> +static const char *const hi3519_compat[] __initconst = {
>> + "hisilicon,hi3519",
>> + NULL,
>> +};
>
> You should just have 1 mach desc with multiple compatible strings to
> match against, not 1 mach desc per compatible string.
Yes, you're right. But Hi3519 is a soc in a new family. It doesn't belong to
any other existing mach descs. And more hi3519 compatible boards will be added
in this mach desc afterwards.
Can I do it like this now, and combine them at a proper time?
Or just add a more generic mach desc, then other socs like hix5hd2/hip01/hip04 can use this?
static const char *const hisilicon_compat[] __initconst = {
"hisilicon,hi3519",
NULL,
};
DT_MACHINE_START(HISILICON_DT, "Hisilicon")
.dt_compat = hisilicon_compat,
MACHINE_END
> Rob
>
>> +
>> +DT_MACHINE_START(HI3519_DT, "Hisilicon Hi3519")
>> + .dt_compat = hi3519_compat,
>> +MACHINE_END
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
