On 12/10/2015 04:21 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > Having a common connector interface across different platforms can be > problematic for determining which SOC device is connected to which > connector pins. The standard DT property "label" is intended to provide > a human readable name for a device and can be used to provide this > information. Then userspace can can read the label to determine the > device mapping. For example: > > for f in $(ls -d /sys/class/tty/tty*); do > label=$(cat $f/device/of_node/label) > if [ "$label" = "LS-UART1" ]; then > # you've found UART1, so do something with it. > # $f/dev is the major:minor for the /dev node > fi > done > > This series adds labels on hikey and dragonboard 410c devices for the > low speed and high speed connectors. Not tested at all. should we then use the line-name property on the GPIOs to have a common naming convention across all 96Boards boards? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
