On 09-12-15, 10:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 14:32:01 Lee Jones wrote:
> > @@ -161,3 +166,11 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata sti_smp_ops = {
> > .smp_secondary_init = sti_secondary_init,
> > .smp_boot_secondary = sti_boot_secondary,
> > };
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * CPUFreq Registration
> > + */
> > +void init_cpufreq(void)
> > +{
> > + platform_device_register_simple("sti-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> > +}
> >
>
> Can you please do this under drivers/cpufreq somewhere?
>
> I really don't want to any more of these in platform code. Requiring a
> device to be created just to probe the driver is really silly.
He is actually creating two device right now..
- create sti-cpufreq device
- so that sti-cpufreq driver get probed
- And fix OPPs here first and then create cpufreq-dt device
- so that cpufreq-dt driver get probed
:)
I already recommended him that he can replace the first two points by
doing things from module_init() instead. And then create cpufreq-dt
device.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
