On 08.12.2015 00:36, Inki Dae wrote: > Hi Javier, > > 2015-12-07 22:41 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Hello Inki, >> >> On 12/07/2015 09:52 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot for posting this patch. >> >>> The DT binding for the Exynos DRM Display Port (DP) driver isn't consistent >>> since it uses a phandle to describe the connection between the DP port and >>> the display panel but uses the OF graph ports and endpoints to describe the >>> connection betwen the DP port, a bridge chip and the panel. >>> >>> The Exynos DP driver and the DT binding have been changed to allow also to >>> describe the DP port to panel connection using ports / endpoints (OF graph) >>> so this patch changes the Exynos5800 Peach Pi DT to make it consistent with >>> the Exynos5420 Peach Pit that has a eDP to LVDS chip and uses OF graph too. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This tag was not in my original patch, it's true that I tested >> it but will someone believe me? ;) > > Oops. I confused you spread Reviewed-by and Tested-by here and there. > Don't worry about that. Will remove it if you don't give me Tested-by. > :) Actually authorship (the "From") in this case means Tested-by. Author always tests the patch so it would look weird if we start adding tested-by to our own patches, right? Dear Inki, However the patch misses your SoB. You touched and sent it so please extend the SoB chain-of-blame. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
