On 07/12/15 12:11, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:02:44PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > Hi again everybody, > > > > thanks a lot to Rob and Vincent for feedback, but, IMHO, we'd need more > > discussion happening on this series to figure out how we move forward; > > so, this is a ping :-). It's a simple information that we need to figure > > out how to provide, and in which form, but it has the potential to form > > a standardized basis for achieving important performance benefits. > > I'm happy to take the first patch, it looks like a simple clean up. > Please arrange for it to land in my patch system. Thanks. > OK, will do. Thanks! > It looks like the second patch doesn't yet have the backing from the DT > people, which prevents the remainder of the patch set progressing. That's > the sticking point which needs to be resolved. > Agreed. That is exactly the point for which I was seeking more feedback. OTOH, 7/8 and 8/8 may potentially work without the DT bindings, as they simply expose a sysfs attribute. If you, and others, see value in them, I can easily put them at the top of the series and post a v2. Thoughts? Best, - Juri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
