On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:51:16PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote: > On 03/12/15 23:45, Mark Brown wrote: > > Are you *sure* these are regulators and not power domains? These names > > look a lot like they could be power domains. > No, I'm not sure. Some of them are may actually be regulators (the "PHY" > ones) while others are almost definitely power domains (like the "FAP" > Forwarding Assist Processor). OK, so the power domains should be being represented and managed as such rather than using regulators - it's a better fit (doing things like support atomic context) and it also sidesteps this. For the things that you say are clearly regulators should we have more information about those?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
