* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [151201 08:48]: > On 12/01/2015 10:43 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Dmitry Lifshitz <lifshitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [151201 08:26]: > >> > >> It might looks the same set of regulators for multiple boards, > >> but it is not. Each board may apply its own regulators usage scheme, and > >> this is our case (as compared to am57xx-beagle-x15.dts). > >> > >> For the best of my knowledge, it used to be in a common *.dtsi file (at > >> least in early OMAP5 DT support in TI kernel tree), but then I found that > >> PMIC registration had been moved to the boards DT files. > > > > Have you actually looked at how much of the implementation is same across > > the omap5 boards? My guess is that a whole lot is same.. See for example > > omap5-board-common.dtsi. > > Unfortunately with DRA7 / AM57xx: > at least 2 different PMICs -> DRA74/DRA72 evms. > even across similar PMIC usage, different voltage rail usage accross > evms: DRA74evm, x15/GPEVM, AM571x-IDK/AM572x-IDK -> they are not > necessarily compatible. > > Example: some of them have Ganged voltage rail, others dont - few others > are mixed. if you are trying to get common regulator usage -> it is > kinda pretty hard given the freedom board designers are being given by > TI.. OMAP5 was more controlled in terms of what specific configuration > the board designers had to follow. that is no longer the case for > DRA7/AM57 platforms. just my 2 cents here. OK thanks for checking. Best to wait a bit on that then until we have more common patterns. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
