On 12/1/2015 8:05 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Linus,
On 15-12-01 02:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Florian Fainelli
<f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 20/11/15 09:58, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote:
This enables the pinctrl support for Broadcom NSP SoC
Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
<yrdreddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks like a sane pinctrl node here, unless there are objections, I
would like to go ahead and apply this for v4.5, thanks!
I'm waiting for an indication from the other BCM pinctrl
maintainers to tell whether this SoC is unique enough to deserve
its own driver.
If Stephen Warren is the other maintainer you are talking about he does
not work at Broadcom. I don't think he is familiar with the variety of
pinctrl implementations present. But yes, the pinctrl implementations
have been rather unique in these Socs. As Ray indicated we're trying to
get the silicon designers to standardize more going forward so we don't
have to create unique drivers for these SoCs.
Yes. Hopefully NSP and NS2 will be the last iProc based SoCs that
require unique pinmux driver.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Regards,
Scott
Thanks,
Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
