On Monday 30 November 2015 01:09:17 Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:34:23PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Good. And Arnd likes the idea too. So we might be converging at > > > last which is a good thing. > > > > I disagree with the idea that there is convergence. There might be > > convergence towards an idea, but... Here's a mail extract, from > > July 7th, from earlier in this very thread: > > > > Pali: > > > Me: > > > > Are the ATAGs at a fixed address on the N900? > > > > > > Yes, in board-rx51.c is: > > > > > > .atag_offset = 0x100 > > > > > > and Nokia Bootloader (proprietary) store them to that address. > > > > > > > Can that be handled in > > > > some kind of legacy file for the N900 which calls save_atags() > > > > on it, so we don't end up introducing yet more stuff that we > > > > have to maintain into the distant future? If not, what about > > > > copying a known working atag structure into a legacy file for > > > > the N900? > > > > > > I already asked question if it is possible to read ATAGs from DT > > > booted kernel. And somebody (do not remember who) wrote to ML, > > > that it is not possible and it can be done in that uncompress > > > code. > > Who is that somebody? If ever it happened to be me then objection is > withdrawn. Otherwise that somebody should come forth and speak up > again. > ... do not remember ... this discussion were in more email threads and takes more then one year... sorry but my memory is not excellent -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
