On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > ST's platforms often have multiple co-processors (usually ST40s or ST231s) >> > on-board. This provides the Linux-side infrastructure to flash and boot >> > them successfully. >> > >> > This set has been tested on an STiH410-B2120. >> >> It would be nice if you could get at least one Reviewed-by tag coming >> outside of ST (e.g., Suman or Bjorn who are actively using and >> improving remoteproc). > > If you require reviews by these guys, shouldn't they be Maintainers? Additional review isn't a requirement, but it's a plus. > Please be aware that > the DTS(I) changes are applied to this set for your information only > and are not to be applied through the RemoteProc tree. The usual > process to which we conform is that Maxime (the STi Maintainer) will > apply the DT changes *after* the main driver has been applied, in this > case by you. Ok, great, so I will not take patches 5 and 6. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
