On 11/22/2015 8:49 AM, Yuval Mintz wrote:
+static void hns_ae_set_tso_stats(struct hnae_handle *handle, int
+enable) {
+ struct hns_ppe_cb *ppe_cb = hns_get_ppe_cb(handle);
+
+ hns_ppe_set_tso_enable(ppe_cb, enable); }
Style issues?
I could not see the code style issue menioned above in earlier submitted
patch. Looks like I am misssing something here!
+static void hns_ae_set_tso_stats(struct hnae_handle *handle, int enable)
+{
+ struct hns_ppe_cb *ppe_cb = hns_get_ppe_cb(handle);
+
+ hns_ppe_set_tso_enable(ppe_cb, enable);
+}
+
+void hns_ppe_set_tso_enable(struct hns_ppe_cb *ppe_cb, u32 value) {
+ dsaf_set_dev_bit(ppe_cb, PPEV2_CFG_TSO_EN_REG, 0, !!value); }
+
Likewise
Same in above case. Hope I am not missing anything.
#include "hns_dsaf_ppe.h"
+void hns_ppe_set_tso_enable(struct hns_ppe_cb *ppe_cb, u32 value)
+{
+ dsaf_set_dev_bit(ppe_cb, PPEV2_CFG_TSO_EN_REG, 0, !!value);
+}
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
