On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:19:05PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > Yes, I can make a big list and even send a patch, but I think it's > putting a band-aid on a non-surgical limb amputation. It would be moving the situation forwards which is something that lengthy e-mails full of architecting with zero code won't do. > > To repeat myself yet again: what is done to the CODEC here is system > > dependent. This includes interaction with other components in the > > system. > In this particular use case (init setting sysclk, and bias_level > callbacks setting sysclk and pll for WM8962), there is no system > dependency except a fixed, unchanging parent clock (it's fixed at card > init and NEVER updated) which the DT binding can solve really easily That is the chosen configuration for the systems you are looking at; other systems do exist. This is the nature of board specifics.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
