On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The axp20x driver assumes the device is i2c based. This is not the
>>> case with later chips, which use a proprietary 2 wire serial bus
>>> by Allwinner called "Reduced Serial Bus".
>>>
>>> This patch follows the example of mfd/wm831x and splits it into
>>> an interface independent core, and an i2c specific glue layer.
>>> MFD_AXP20X and the new MFD_AXP20X_I2C are changed to tristate
>>> symbols, allowing the driver to be built as modules.
>>>
>>> Included but unused header files are removed as well.
So…
>>> + if (dev->of_node) {
>>
>> What about
>>
>> if (…of_node) {
>> const struct of_device_id *id;
>> …
>> } else if ACPI_COMPANION(…) {
This should be has_acpi_companion().
>> const struct acpi_device_id *id;
>> …
>> } else {
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>
> I really don't want to change code that I'm just moving around.
> Same goes for the other comments about this patch. I can do another
> patch on top of this to fix the style issues if it really bothers
> people.
Fair enough.
My comments mostly about unnecessity of second parameter in the functions.
So, you already did some clean up in this patch (above), what about
to do another? I also prefer separate patch *before* you do a split.
>>> + axp20x = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(*axp20x), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!axp20x)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + ret = axp20x_i2c_match_device(axp20x, &i2c->dev);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + axp20x->dev = &i2c->dev;
>>> + axp20x->irq = i2c->irq;
>>
>> If you move _match_device() here you will be able to drop away struct
>> device * parameter.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
