On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:24:35PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>The pdn (struct pci_dn) instances are allocated from memblock or >>bootmem when creating PCI controller (hoses) in setup_arch(). PCI >>hotplug, which will be supported by proceeding patches, release >>PCI device nodes and their corresponding pdn on unplugging event. >>The memory chunks for pdn instances allocated from memblock or >>bootmem are hard to reused after being released. >> >>This delays creating pdn in core_initcall_sync(eeh_dev_phb_init) so >>that they are allocated from slab. In turn, the memory chunks for >>them can be reused after being released without problem. Since the >>pdn and eeh_dev has same life cycle, the eeh_dev is created when >>pdn is populated. We needn't create eeh_dev with another initcall. >>The time to create PHB PEs is delayed a bit from core_initcall() to >>core_initcall_sync(). > >Why is delayed? I mean what needs to be called before eeh_dev_phb_init()? > I think the changelog explains the "why". eeh_dev_phb_init() creates ancestor PE for all other PEs. The ancestor PEs should be created before other PEs. eeh_dev_phb_init() depends on PHBs (struct pci_controllers) only. >> >>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>--- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 2 +- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h | 2 -- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c | 19 ++++------------- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++-- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/pci.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++------------ >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c | 3 --- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pci.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 3 --- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 6 +----- >> 9 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) >> >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>index c5eb86f..27352f4 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ void eeh_pe_restore_bars(struct eeh_pe *pe); >> const char *eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe); >> struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe); >> >>-void *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn, void *data); >>+struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn); >> void eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb); >> int eeh_init(void); >> int __init eeh_ops_register(struct eeh_ops *ops); >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>index 8753e4e..0f73de0 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-pci.h >>@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ void *pci_traverse_device_nodes(struct device_node *start, >> void *traverse_pci_dn(struct pci_dn *root, >> void *(*fn)(struct pci_dn *, void *), >> void *data); >>- >>-extern void pci_devs_phb_init(void); >> extern void pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb); >> >> /* From rtas_pci.h */ >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c >>index aabba94..1c4bc35 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c >>@@ -44,14 +44,13 @@ >> /** >> * eeh_dev_init - Create EEH device according to OF node >> * @pdn: PCI device node >>- * @data: PHB >> * >> * It will create EEH device according to the given OF node. The function >> * might be called by PCI emunation, DR, PHB hotplug. >> */ >>-void *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn, void *data) >>+struct eeh_dev *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn) >> { >>- struct pci_controller *phb = data; >>+ struct pci_controller *phb = pdn->phb; >> struct eeh_dev *edev; >> >> /* Allocate EEH device */ >>@@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ void *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn, void *data) >> edev->phb = phb; >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&edev->list); >> >>- return NULL; >>+ return edev; >> } >> >> /** >>@@ -80,16 +79,8 @@ void *eeh_dev_init(struct pci_dn *pdn, void *data) >> */ >> void eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) >> { >>- struct pci_dn *root = phb->pci_data; >>- >> /* EEH PE for PHB */ >> eeh_phb_pe_create(phb); >>- >>- /* EEH device for PHB */ >>- eeh_dev_init(root, phb); >>- >>- /* EEH devices for children OF nodes */ >>- traverse_pci_dn(root, eeh_dev_init, phb); >> } >> >> /** >>@@ -105,9 +96,7 @@ static int __init eeh_dev_phb_init(void) >> list_for_each_entry_safe(phb, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) >> eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic(phb); >> >>- pr_info("EEH: devices created\n"); >>- >> return 0; >> } >> >>-core_initcall(eeh_dev_phb_init); >>+core_initcall_sync(eeh_dev_phb_init); > > >May be remove core_initcall_sync and call eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() directly >from the loop in pci_devs_phb_init()? > We can't do that as eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() can be called for newly added PHB. >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>index aa4110f..581612c 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>@@ -272,8 +272,11 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_add_device_node_info(struct pci_controller *hose, >> const __be32 *regs; >> struct device_node *parent; >> struct pci_dn *pdn; >>+#ifdef CONFIG_EEH >>+ struct eeh_dev *edev; >>+#endif >> >>- pdn = zalloc_maybe_bootmem(sizeof(*pdn), GFP_KERNEL); >>+ pdn = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdn), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (pdn == NULL) >> return NULL; >> dn->data = pdn; >>@@ -302,6 +305,15 @@ struct pci_dn *pci_add_device_node_info(struct pci_controller *hose, >> /* Extended config space */ >> pdn->pci_ext_config_space = (type && of_read_number(type, 1) == 1); >> >>+ /* Create EEH device */ >>+#ifdef CONFIG_EEH >>+ edev = eeh_dev_init(pdn); >>+ if (!edev) { >>+ kfree(pdn); >>+ return NULL; >>+ } >>+#endif >>+ >> /* Attach to parent node */ >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdn->child_list); >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdn->list); >>@@ -486,15 +498,19 @@ void pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(struct pci_controller *phb) >> * pci device found underneath. This routine runs once, >> * early in the boot sequence. >> */ >>-void __init pci_devs_phb_init(void) >>+static int __init pci_devs_phb_init(void) >> { >> struct pci_controller *phb, *tmp; >> >> /* This must be done first so the device nodes have valid pci info! */ >> list_for_each_entry_safe(phb, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) >> pci_devs_phb_init_dynamic(phb); >>+ >>+ return 0; >> } >> >>+core_initcall(pci_devs_phb_init); >>+ >> static void pci_dev_pdn_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> { >> struct pci_dn *pdn; >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/pci.c >>index a923230..a2f89e6 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/pci.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/pci.c >>@@ -568,6 +568,26 @@ void maple_pci_irq_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) >> DBG(" <- maple_pci_irq_fixup\n"); >> } >> >>+static int maple_pci_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) >>+{ >>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bridge->bus); >>+ struct device_node *np, *child; >>+ >>+ if (hose != u3_agp) >>+ return 0; >>+ >>+ /* Fixup the PCI<->OF mapping for U3 AGP due to bus renumbering. We >>+ * assume there is no P2P bridge on the AGP bus, which should be a >>+ * safe assumptions hopefully. >>+ */ >>+ np = hose->dn; >>+ PCI_DN(np)->busno = 0xf0; >>+ for_each_child_of_node(np, child) >>+ PCI_DN(child)->busno = 0xf0; >>+ >>+ return 0; >>+} >>+ >> void __init maple_pci_init(void) >> { >> struct device_node *np, *root; >>@@ -605,19 +625,7 @@ void __init maple_pci_init(void) >> if (ht && maple_add_bridge(ht) != 0) >> of_node_put(ht); >> >>- /* Setup the linkage between OF nodes and PHBs */ >>- pci_devs_phb_init(); >>- >>- /* Fixup the PCI<->OF mapping for U3 AGP due to bus renumbering. We >>- * assume there is no P2P bridge on the AGP bus, which should be a >>- * safe assumptions hopefully. >>- */ >>- if (u3_agp) { >>- struct device_node *np = u3_agp->dn; >>- PCI_DN(np)->busno = 0xf0; >>- for (np = np->child; np; np = np->sibling) >>- PCI_DN(np)->busno = 0xf0; >>- } >>+ ppc_md.pcibios_root_bridge_prepare = maple_pci_root_bridge_prepare; > > >This seems an unrelated change. > >What is this pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()? How come you do not need one for >the powernv platform but do need for others? Same question about powermac. > The function is fixing up pdn for U3 AGP device. As the pdn creation is delayed to core_initcall(), the pdn isn't created when maple_pci_init() is called. So the pdn's fixup work is delay to ppc_md.pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(). >> >> /* Tell pci.c to not change any resource allocations. */ >> pci_add_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY); >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c >>index f3a68a0..10c4e8f 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c >>@@ -229,9 +229,6 @@ void __init pas_pci_init(void) >> of_node_get(np); >> >> of_node_put(root); >>- >>- /* Setup the linkage between OF nodes and PHBs */ >>- pci_devs_phb_init(); >> } >> >> void __iomem *pasemi_pci_getcfgaddr(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset) >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pci.c >>index 59ab16f..6e06c3b 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pci.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pci.c >>@@ -878,6 +878,29 @@ void pmac_pci_irq_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) >> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC32 */ >> } >> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 >>+static int pmac_pci_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge) >>+{ >>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bridge->bus); >>+ struct device_node *np, *child; >>+ >>+ if (hose != u3_agp) >>+ return 0; >>+ >>+ /* Fixup the PCI<->OF mapping for U3 AGP due to bus renumbering. We >>+ * assume there is no P2P bridge on the AGP bus, which should be a >>+ * safe assumptions for now. We should do something better in the >>+ * future though >>+ */ >>+ np = hose->dn; >>+ PCI_DN(np)->busno = 0xf0; >>+ for_each_child_of_node(np, child) >>+ PCI_DN(child)->busno = 0xf0; >>+ >>+ return 0; >>+} >>+#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ >>+ >> void __init pmac_pci_init(void) >> { >> struct device_node *np, *root; >>@@ -914,20 +937,7 @@ void __init pmac_pci_init(void) >> if (ht && pmac_add_bridge(ht) != 0) >> of_node_put(ht); >> >>- /* Setup the linkage between OF nodes and PHBs */ >>- pci_devs_phb_init(); >>- >>- /* Fixup the PCI<->OF mapping for U3 AGP due to bus renumbering. We >>- * assume there is no P2P bridge on the AGP bus, which should be a >>- * safe assumptions for now. We should do something better in the >>- * future though >>- */ >>- if (u3_agp) { >>- struct device_node *np = u3_agp->dn; >>- PCI_DN(np)->busno = 0xf0; >>- for (np = np->child; np; np = np->sibling) >>- PCI_DN(np)->busno = 0xf0; >>- } >>+ ppc_md.pcibios_root_bridge_prepare = pmac_pci_root_bridge_prepare; >> /* pmac_check_ht_link(); */ >> >> #else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c >>index fa99daf..d8832ea 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c >>@@ -807,9 +807,6 @@ void __init pnv_pci_init(void) >> for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "ibm,ioda2-phb") >> pnv_pci_init_ioda2_phb(np); >> >>- /* Setup the linkage between OF nodes and PHBs */ >>- pci_devs_phb_init(); >>- >> /* Configure IOMMU DMA hooks */ >> set_pci_dma_ops(&dma_iommu_ops); >> } >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c >>index 6c274cb..bdf93a1 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c >>@@ -262,11 +262,8 @@ static int pci_dn_reconfig_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long act >> case OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE: >> parent = of_get_parent(np); >> pdn = parent ? PCI_DN(parent) : NULL; >>- if (pdn) { >>- /* Create pdn and EEH device */ >>+ if (pdn) >> pci_add_device_node_info(pdn->phb, np); >>- eeh_dev_init(PCI_DN(np), pdn->phb); >>- } >> >> of_node_put(parent); >> break; >>@@ -489,7 +486,6 @@ static void __init find_and_init_phbs(void) >> } >> >> of_node_put(root); >>- pci_devs_phb_init(); >> >> /* >> * PCI_PROBE_ONLY and PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS can be set via properties >> Thanks, Gavin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html