On 11/16/2015 09:21 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:48:00AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/10/2015 07:14 PM, Peter Chen wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:46:51PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: >>>>> This fixes a bug where if you disconnect and re-connect the USB cable, >>>>> the gadget driver stops working. >>>>> >>>>> Add support for async_irq to wake up driver from low power mode. >>>>> Without this, the power management code never calls resume. >>>>> Also, have the phy driver kick the gadget driver (chipidea otg) >>>>> by having the chipidea driver register with it, for vbus connect >>>>> notifications. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c | 6 ++++++ >>>>> drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>>> include/linux/usb/msm_hsusb.h | 1 + >>>>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) > > I just wanna know how you guys want this to be handled ? Through my tree > or chipidea's ? Or do we break the dependencies between the changes ? I'm fine with splitting it up. I'm sending a new series with 3 patches right after this message. Do both trees go to linux-next? -- Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html