2015-11-20 17:12 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Marcus Weseloh wrote: >> > (and the wdelay should >> > arguably be a core-spi thing, not a sunxi thing, but that's a separate >> > discussion) >> >> I've been thinking about that, but it seemed to big a change to >> attempt with my limited kernel hacking experience. > > It is not any bigger. You just need to document it in the core binding. > It would still be read by the drivers using it. Julien, Rob: thanks for your comments! Ok, I will make the following changes: - remove "sun4i,spi-wdelay" from the sun4i binding and add the property to the spi-bus.txt binding instead - remove the comment about the additional 3 cycles from the documentation - modfy the spi-sun4i driver to take care of the minimum 3 cycle period Does that sound right? And maybe I could also use a more descriptive name for the property, maybe "spi-word-wait-cycles"? Cheers, Marcus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
