On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 06:52:57PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 19.11.2015 16:18, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> >>> +static void select_assert(void *context)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct eeprom_93xx46_dev *edev = context;
> >>> +
> >>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio_to_desc(edev->pdata->select_gpio), 1);
> >>
> >> I would suggest to use gpio_set_value()
> >
> > Could you explain why?
> >
> > Maybe this gpio is on an SPI GPIO expander?
>
> My point is that gpio_*() interface, gpio_set_value() or
> gpio_set_value_cansleep(), might be preferred is this particular case.
Ah, O.K, yes, avoid the gpio_to_desc() call.
Agreed.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
