On 18/11/15 16:03, Ray Jui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/2015 3:13 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
>> Add device tree entries for clock support for Broadcom Northstar 2 SoC
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi | 80
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>> index 9610822..a510d3a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm-ns2.h>
>>
>> /memreserve/ 0x84b00000 0x00000008;
>>
>> @@ -109,6 +110,33 @@
>> <&A57_3>;
>> };
>>
>> + clocks {
>
> Is this a new convention? That is, group all clocks without a base
> register address in a node named "clocks", but at the same time, put all
> other clocks with base register address under a bus node.
I do not think that is new, lots of platforms do that. The clock
providers/controllers would typically be in the 'bus' nodes because it
has a register interface, while the synthetic clocks would be under
'clocks'.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
