On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 01:11:56PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 11/17/2015 12:38 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:02:03PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>>>This enables M64 window on P7IOC, which has been enabled on PHB3.
>>>>Different from PHB3 where 16 M64 BARs are supported and each of
>>>>them can be owned by one particular PE# exclusively or divided
>>>>evenly to 256 segments, every P7IOC PHB has 16 M64 BARs and each
>>>>of them are divided to 8 segments. So every P7IOC PHB supports
>>>>128 M64 segments in total. P7IOC has M64DT, which helps mapping
>>>>one particular M64 segment# to arbitrary PE#. PHB3 doesn't have
>>>>M64DT, indicating that one M64 segment can only be pinned to the
>>>>fixed PE#. In order to have same code to support M64 on P7IOC and
>>>>PHB3, we just provide 128 M64 segments on every P7IOC PHB and each
>>>>of them is pinned to the fixed PE# by bypassing the function of
>>>>M64DT. In turn, we just need different phb->init_m64() for P7IOC
>>>>and PHB3 to support M64.
>>>>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>---
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 3 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>index 1f7d985..bfe69f1 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>@@ -256,6 +256,64 @@ static void pnv_ioda_reserve_dev_m64_pe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>+static int pnv_ioda1_init_m64(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct resource *r;
>>>>+ int index;
>>>>+
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * There are 16 M64 BARs, each of which has 8 segments. So
>>>>+ * there are as many M64 segments as the maximum number of
>>>>+ * PEs, which is 128.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ for (index = 0; index < PNV_IODA1_M64_NUM; index++) {
>>>>+ unsigned long base, segsz = phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>>>>+ int64_t rc;
>>>>+
>>>>+ base = phb->ioda.m64_base +
>>>>+ index * PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS * segsz;
>>>>+ rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, index, base, 0,
>>>>+ PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS * segsz);
>>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>>>+ pr_warn(" Error %lld setting M64 PHB#%d-BAR#%d\n",
>>>>+ rc, phb->hose->global_number, index);
>>>>+ goto fail;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, index,
>>>>+ OPAL_ENABLE_M64_SPLIT);
>>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>>>+ pr_warn(" Error %lld enabling M64 PHB#%d-BAR#%d\n",
>>>>+ rc, phb->hose->global_number, index);
>>>>+ goto fail;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * Exclude the segment used by the reserved PE, which
>>>>+ * is expected to be 0 or last supported PE#.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ r = &phb->hose->mem_resources[1];
>>>
>>>
>>>What does "1" mean here? A bridge's 64bit prefetchable window?
>>>
>>
>>It's PHB's M64 window.
>
>mem_resources[] of a hose are not windows of the root PCI bridge?
>
No. They're windows for root bus, but not for root PCI bridge.
>>
>>>
>>>>+ if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == 0)
>>>>+ r->start += phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>>>>+ else if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == (phb->ioda.total_pe_num - 1))
>>>>+ r->end -= phb->ioda.m64_segsize;
>>>>+ else
>>>>+ pr_warn(" Cannot cut M64 segment for reserved PE#%d\n",
>>>>+ phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx);
>>>>+
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
