Hi, On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:35 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The standard touch screen bindings [1] replace the private ti,swap-xy > with touchscreen-swaped-x-y. And for the Openpandora we use > touchscreen-size etc. to match the LCD screen size. > > [1]: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.txt > > Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-lilly-a83x.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++---- > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-panel-sharp-ls037v7dw01.dtsi | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-lilly-a83x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-lilly-a83x.dtsi > index d0dd036..01dae66 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-lilly-a83x.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-lilly-a83x.dtsi > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ > ti,y-max = /bits/ 16 <3600>; > ti,x-plate-ohms = /bits/ 16 <80>; > ti,pressure-max = /bits/ 16 <255>; > - ti,swap-xy; > + touchscreen-swapped-x-y; > > linux,wakeup; > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi > index f672a04..9497cc6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-common.dtsi > @@ -696,10 +696,19 @@ > pendown-gpio = <&gpio3 30 0>; > vcc-supply = <&vaux4>; > > - ti,x-min = /bits/ 16 <0>; > - ti,x-max = /bits/ 16 <8000>; > - ti,y-min = /bits/ 16 <0>; > - ti,y-max = /bits/ 16 <4800>; > + touchscreen-size-x = <800>; > + touchscreen-size-y = <480>; > + touchscreen-max-pressure = <1000>; > + touchscreen-fuzz-x = <16>; > + touchscreen-fuzz-y = <16>; > + touchscreen-fuzz-pressure = <10>; > + touchscreen-inverted-x; > + touchscreen-inverted-y; > + > + ti,x-min = /bits/ 16 <160>; > + ti,x-max = /bits/ 16 <3900>; > + ti,y-min = /bits/ 16 <220>; > + ti,y-max = /bits/ 16 <3750>; I'm not sure this is a good idea, there have been at least 3 different batches of LCDs which slightly different touchscreens attached, with such thresholds we might end up with unreachable touchscreen points on some units. If I understand right, calibration won't help if for some screen locations ADC reading goes below/above these min/max thresholds on some specific units? If so there should probably be at least 10% margin in either case to make calibration useful. Gražvydas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
