Hi Arnd,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:27:03AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2015 17:50:24 Jens Kuske wrote:
> >
> > +static int sun8i_h3_bus_reset_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > + const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int index = reset_spec->args[0];
> > +
> > + if (index < 96)
> > + return index;
> > + else if (index < 128)
> > + return index + 32;
> > + else if (index < 160)
> > + return index + 64;
> > + else
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> >
>
> This looks like you are doing something wrong and should either
> put the actual number into DT,
This is the actual number, except that there's some useless registers
in between. Allwinner documents it like that:
0x0 Reset 0
0x4 Reset 1
0xc Reset 2
So we have to adjust the offset to account with the blank register in
between (0x8).
> or use a two-cell representation, with the first cell indicating the
> block (0, 1 or 2), and the second cell the index.
And the missing register is not a block either.
That would also imply either changing the bindings of that driver (and
all the current DTS that are using it), or introducing a whole new
driver just to deal with some extraordinary offset calculation.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
