Hi Arnd, On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:28:55AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2015 17:50:22 Jens Kuske wrote: > > + of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names", > > + i, &clk_name); > > + > > + if (index == 17 || (index >= 29 && index <= 31)) > > + clk_parent = AHB2; > > + else if (index <= 63 || index >= 128) > > + clk_parent = AHB1; > > + else if (index >= 64 && index <= 95) > > + clk_parent = APB1; > > + else if (index >= 96 && index <= 127) > > + clk_parent = APB2; > > + > > + clk_reg = reg + 4 * (index / 32); > > > > Same as for the reset driver, this probably means you should have one > cell to indicate which bus it is for, and another cell for the > index. It's not really comparable to the reset driver. What's happening here is that we have a single set of (contiguous) registers, controlling gates from different parents. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature