On Oct 29, 2013, at 3:44 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:24:16AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Simon Horman wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:06:01PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote: >>>> R-Car Gen2 SoCs have a different PHY which is not compatible >>>> with the older R-Car H1 (R8A7779) version. >>>> This adds OF/platform device id tables and PHY initialization >>>> callbacks for the following Gen2 SoCs: >>>> * R-Car H2: R8A7790; >>>> * R-Car M2: R8A7791. >>>> >>>> PHY initialization method is chosen based on the device id. >>>> Default PHY settings are applied for Gen2 SoCs, which should >>>> suit the Gen2 boards available. >>>> >>>> The R8A7779 platform code is modified to use "sata-r8a7779" >>>> device name. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt | 5 +- >>>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c | 2 +- >>>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7779.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++--- >>> >>> Hi Mark, Hi Device-Tree Folks, >>> >>> I'm wondering if you have had a chance to look over the bindings >>> aspect of this and the other patch in the series. I believe that >>> this series addresses all previous review in that regards. >> >> What tree is this binding in? > > sata_car.txt is added by the previous patch in this series > "[PATCH 1/2] sata_rcar: Adjust and document device tree bindings" Why not just have all the binding in one patch. There isn't a reason this should be split. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
