On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30-10-15, 15:18, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> A side-note. I wonder if it would be better style to have the
>> node name be:
>>
>> opp@600000000 {
>
> I thought the @... had a special meaning and we might end up creating
> some device for the node then? Perhaps I am mistaken.
There is no special meaning, just convention which is the unit-address
should match the reg property address. I'm okay with an exception
here.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
