Hello! > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-samsung-soc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-samsung-soc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Pankaj Dubey > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:28 PM > To: Pavel Fedin > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Herring; Pawel Moll; Mark Rutland; Ian Campbell; Kumar Gala; > Kukjin Kim; Krzysztof Kozlowski > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: dts: Add SROMc to Exynos 5410 > > Hi Pavel, > > On 29 October 2015 at 18:12, Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This machine uses own SoC device tree file, add missing part. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi > > index 4603356..da6a8fa0e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi > > @@ -101,6 +101,15 @@ > > reg = <0x10000000 0x100>; > > }; > > > > + sromc: sromc@12250000 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges; > > + > > We do not need to specify these three properties as they are already > present in parent node "soc". We do, otherwise dtc complains about defaults of #address-cells = 2 and #size-cells=1, and without empty "ranges" subnode's resources are not correctly translated. > > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos-srom"; > > + reg = <0x12250000 0x14>; > > + }; > > + > > pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10040000 { > > compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-pmu", "syscon"; > > reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>; > > @@ -133,6 +142,12 @@ > > <10 &gic 0 130 0>, > > <11 &gic 0 131 0>; > > }; > > + > > + arch_timer { > > + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer"; > > + clock-frequency = <24000000>; > > + }; > > + > > This change should not be part of this patch. Ooops, thank you very much, this should not have been here at all. This is a leftover from my experiments, i was tracing DT parsing code and added it just for test, to see why timer gets probed as a subnode. Just forgot to remove it afterwards and it slipped into the patch. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html