Hi Kamil,
On Monday 28 of October 2013 14:52:19 Kamil Debski wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> Thank you for your review! I will answer your comments below.
[snip]
> > > +
> > > + switch (drv->cfg->cpu) {
> > > + case TYPE_EXYNOS4210:
> >
> > > + case TYPE_EXYNOS4212:
> > Lets not add such cpu checks inside driver.
>
> Some SoC have a special register, which switches the OTG lines between
> device and host modes. I understand that it might not be the prettiest
> code. I see this as a good compromise between having a single huge
> driver for all Exynos SoCs and having a multiple drivers for each SoC
> version. PHY IPs in these chips very are similar but have to be handled
> differently. Any other ideas to solve this issue?
Maybe adding a flag in drv->cfg called, for example, .has_mode_switch
could solve this problem without having to check the SoC type explicitly?
[snip]
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4210_USB
> >
> > Do we really need this?
>
> No we don't. The driver can always support all Exynos SoC versions.
> These config options were added for flexibility.
>
> > > +extern const struct uphy_config exynos4210_uphy_config; #endif
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4212_USB
> >
> > Same here.
> >
> > > +extern const struct uphy_config exynos4212_uphy_config; #endif
> > > +
> > > +static const struct of_device_id exynos_uphy_of_match[] = { #ifdef
> > > +CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4210_USB
> >
> > #if not needed here.
>
> If the #ifdef CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4210_USB is removed then yes. Otherwise
> it is necessary - exynos4210_uphy_config may be undefined.
I believe this and other ifdefs below are needed, otherwise, with support
for one of the SoCs disabled, the driver could still bind to its
compatible value.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
