On Oct 26, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 01:37:57AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:41:20PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>>>> +- interrupt: should be one of the following
>>>>> + - <8>: For controllers compatible with twl4030
>>>>
>>>> Just checking, but the interrupt is always 8 for this device?
>>>
>>> Yes. It's currently hardcoded in drivers/mfd/twl-core.c.
>>
>> The fact that is hard coded in the driver does not imply that it
>> should be in the device tree binding. Is there an interrupt
>> controller as part of the TWL4030?
>
> Hardware looks like this:
>
> &twl4030 {
> compatible = "ti,twl4030";
> interrupt-controller;
> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>
> twl_pwrbutton: pwrbutton {
> compatible = "ti,twl4030-pwrbutton";
> interrupts = <8>; /* 8th interrupt from the twl4030 */
> };
> };
>
> Simplified the initialization of twl4030 stuff works
> like this for non DT boot:
>
> twl4030_init(...) {
> init_subdev(...);
> init_subdev("twl4030-pwrbutton", ..., irq=8, ...);
> init_subdev(...);
> };
>
> -- Sebastian
ok, than other than Grant's comment about merging some of this together with the other twl4030 bindings, ack.
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
