On Oct 24, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 22:51:28 +0100, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This is a very quick proof-of-concept re: how a DT schema checker might >> look if written in C, and integrated into dtc. > > Thanks for looking at this. > > Very interesting. Certainly an expedient way to start checking schemas, > and for certain bindings it may be the best approach. The downside is it > forces a recompilation of DTC to bring in new bindings and it isn't a > great meduim for mixing schema with documentation in the bindings. > > g. Yeah, I think any solution has to make the Documentation and the schema representation one thing otherwise more error prone and another set of things to review. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
