Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 09:32 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:29:23AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 
> > It starts by looking up the machine ID (in procfs, but may be overridden
> > because some board vendors don't set it correctly).  If the machine is
> > supported using FDT then there is an associated DTB file which will have
> > been installed with the kernel.  The script copies/appends this to the
> > appropriate place for the boot loader.
> 
> And if the ID is not recognized, then what?

Then we have no idea even where to install the kernel, or what wrapper
might be needed, so the boot loader will load it.  Lack of a DTB file is
a small problem; it would be easy to add an option to provide one
outside the kernel package.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux